RAG Development Services

What is RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)?

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a way of building AI assistants that first look up the most relevant passages in your own documents and records, then answer using only those passages and cite them. The model does not need to have been trained on your data. It reads what was retrieved, at the moment of the question.

This matters because a general model knows nothing about your policies, prices or patients. Asked anyway, it guesses. With RAG the answer is grounded in your content, and when nothing relevant is found, the assistant can say so instead of inventing something.

RAG also keeps costs and exposure down. Only the passages needed for a question are sent to the model, and the documents themselves stay in storage you control.

  • Grounded answers that cite the source document
  • Only relevant passages sent, so costs stay controlled
  • Documents stay in infrastructure you control

From scattered documents to a working assistant

A useful assistant starts with the questions people really ask and the documents that should answer them. We get retrieval right first, then add answers with sources and human review.

  1. 1. Collect the questions

    We gather the questions people actually ask, from staff, inboxes and call logs.

  2. 2. Audit the content

    We check which documents answer them, which are out of date and what is missing.

  3. 3. Build retrieval first

    We tune how content is split and searched until the right passages come back for your questions.

  4. 4. Add answers and review

    The model answers from retrieved passages with sources, and a person reviews where it matters.

  5. 5. Launch and monitor

    We track failed and low-rated questions and fix the content or retrieval behind them.

RAG Development Services | Algon Solutions

Why document assistants give poor answers

When a RAG assistant gets things wrong, the cause is usually in retrieval, not the model.

  • Out-of-date documents

    Old and new versions of a policy sit side by side, and the assistant quotes the wrong one.

  • The wrong passage is found

    Documents are split carelessly, so the passage retrieved lacks the detail that answers the question.

  • No sources shown

    Staff cannot tell where an answer came from, so they either trust it blindly or ignore it.

  • Access ignored

    Everyone can retrieve everything, including records they should not see.

  • Answers when it should not

    When nothing relevant is found, the assistant fills the gap instead of saying so.

  • Never measured

    Nobody tracks which questions fail, so the same gaps stay open for months.

What we build

  1. Staff knowledge assistants
    01

    Staff knowledge assistants

    Policies, procedures and manuals made searchable in plain language, with the source passage shown.

  2. Customer-facing assistants
    02

    Customer-facing assistants

    Answers for customers, patients or students from approved content only, with hand-off to a person.

  3. Assistants on case records
    03

    Assistants on case records

    Look up and summarise a customer's or patient's history across records, respecting who may see what.

  4. Document ingestion pipelines
    04

    Document ingestion pipelines

    New and updated documents picked up automatically, with old versions retired.

  5. Access-aware retrieval
    05

    Access-aware retrieval

    Retrieval filtered by role, so each user only gets answers from content they are allowed to see.

  6. Answer quality tracking
    06

    Answer quality tracking

    Unanswered and low-rated questions logged, so missing content and weak retrieval get fixed.

RAG, or something simpler?

RAG is not always the answer. We match the approach to your question and your content.

ApproachFits whenWatch out for
Rules or plain searchQuestions are predictable and the answers are short and fixedBreaks down when people phrase things differently
RAGAnswers live in your documents and records and change over timeNeeds well-kept documents and careful retrieval design
Fine-tuningYou need a consistent style or format across many outputsDoes not keep facts current and costs more to update
Plain LLMThe task needs general knowledge, not your company's informationWill guess about anything specific to your business

Every stage of a RAG system

StageWhat happensWhat we check
IngestDocuments and records are collected from where they liveOnly current, approved versions are included
Chunk & indexContent is split into passages and indexed for searchPassages keep enough context to stand on their own
RetrieveThe most relevant passages are found for each questionThe right passages come back, filtered by user access
AnswerThe model answers using only those passages and cites themThe answer matches the sources, or says nothing was found
ReviewA person checks answers where the stakes are highReviewers can see sources and correct quickly
MonitorQuestions, answers and ratings are trackedFailed questions lead to content or retrieval fixes

What you can expect

  • Sources on every answer

    Staff can open the passage an answer came from and check it in seconds.

  • Retrieval tested first

    We measure whether the right passages are found before we judge the answers.

  • Says when it does not know

    If nothing relevant is found, the assistant says so or hands over to a person.

  • Your data, your infrastructure

    Documents and indexes stay in systems you control. Hosting is confirmed per project.

Frequently asked questions

  • Policies, manuals, procedures, FAQs, contracts, case notes and records from your systems. Text-based files work best. Scanned documents need text extraction first.

  • No. RAG looks up the relevant passages at the moment of the question and gives them to the model. Your documents are not used to train it.

  • We set up ingestion so new and changed documents are picked up automatically and old versions retired. The answer changes as soon as the document does.

  • Yes. Retrieval is filtered by role, so a user only gets answers drawn from content they are already allowed to see.

  • The assistant says it could not find it, and can hand the question to a named person. Those gaps are logged so you can add the missing content.

  • Running costs depend on usage and the model chosen. RAG helps keep them controlled, because only the few passages relevant to a question are sent to the model, and we monitor usage from day one.

  • Yes, with access control, audit logging and data kept in infrastructure you control. A clinician reviews anything that reaches a patient or their record.

Send us the questions your team keeps asking

We will check whether your documents can answer them, and whether RAG or something simpler is the right fit.

Or write directly to support@algonsolutions.com

Describe the bottleneck

We reply within one working day.

By sending this you agree to our privacy policy.